Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 14:46:11 -0500 Message-Id: <200002281946.OAA18911@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: fujieda AT jaist DOT ac DOT jp CC: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com In-reply-to: (message from Kazuhiro Fujieda on 26 Feb 2000 23:58:50 +0900) Subject: Re: next net release preview References: <200002232151 DOT QAA14479 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> > Neverthless, I hope that Cygnus/Red Hat defines definitely the > reasonable policy about packages, such as the prefix directory, > the host type name (i686-pc-cygwin32 or i686-pc-cygwin ?), and > so on. What's in the preview doesn't meet all the goals I'd like. I'm hoping that new packages would be: i686-pc-cygwin --prefix=/usr The target was discussed in a past thread; I don't recall about the prefix.