Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 14:28:04 -0500 To: Kazuhiro Fujieda Cc: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: next net release preview Message-ID: <20000227142803.B7196@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <200002231919 DOT OAA05700 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.4i In-Reply-To: ; from fujieda@jaist.ac.jp on Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 10:12:19PM +0900 On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 10:12:19PM +0900, Kazuhiro Fujieda wrote: >>>> On 25 Feb 2000 01:16:56 +0900 >>>> Kazuhiro Fujieda said: > >> > Please download and review it, and post comments here. >> >> Many commands are build to read files in the directories below >> `/usr/share'. Will the installer come to install them in the >> directories directly ? > >I try to change the point at issue. > >Many commands are build to directly read files in the >directories below `/usr/share'. > >In the README file, DJ writes someting like that users may be >able to choose an arbitrary "cygwin root" directory. But users >can only choose the real root directory as the cygwin root >without any additional operations. > >If an user choose `C:\cygwin' as the root, he/she have to mount >`C:\cygwin\usr' on `/usr'. Why would anyone have to mount anything? c:\cygwin\usr will work fine. >But '/usr/local' has been already used by various packages on >the `Franken Archives' or the `Utilities for Cygwin' as their >prefix directory. This mount hides the 'local' directory. So >he/she has to mount some of directories under `C:\cygwin\usr' >under `/usr' one by one. The use of c:\cygwin as a root is consistent with the Cygwin CD. Also, this is supposed to be the base cygwin release. I don't see any reason to adhere to other people's conventions. We should be setting conventions and establishing a root and /usr seems, to me, to be the best solution for people grabbing cygwin for the first time. cgf