Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From: Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 20:59:46 -0500
To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject: Re: next net release preview
Message-ID: <20000223205946.A31960@cygnus.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
References: <Pine DOT NEB DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10002231253470 DOT 13918-100000 AT cesium DOT clock DOT org> <200002232151 DOT QAA14479 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20000223191420 DOT A20059 AT shell4 DOT ba DOT best DOT com> <200002240035 DOT TAA11422 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20000223200843 DOT A643 AT shell4 DOT ba DOT best DOT com> <200002240110 DOT UAA11995 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20000223204140 DOT A11405 AT shell4 DOT ba DOT best DOT com> <20000223204553 DOT F31789 AT cygnus DOT com> <20000223205415 DOT B11405 AT shell4 DOT ba DOT best DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.4i
In-Reply-To: <20000223205415.B11405@shell4.ba.best.com>; from glenn@gs.fay.nc.us on Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 08:54:18PM -0500

On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 08:54:18PM -0500, Glenn Spell wrote:
>On 23 Feb 2000 around 8:45PM (-0500) Chris Faylor wrote:
>> A cygwin-ports mailing list might make sense.
>
>BTW, that's what I had in mind when I asked that the structure of the
>xfree list be reconsidered.

I don't know (or remember?) what you're referring to but the xfree
mailing list was started with one purpose in mind -- to port the XFree86
server to Windows.  There is minimal traffic on the xfree mailing list
so "splitting" it does not make sense.

In the same light, it may not make sense to split cygwin-developers
either.  We can use it to discuss ports of the core distribution
for a while.  If this becomes hard to manage, I will start a new list.

cgf