Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-Id: <199912100910.DAA01603@mercury.xraylith.wisc.edu>
To: Andrew Dalgleish <andrewd AT axonet DOT com DOT au>
cc: "'cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com'" <cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject: Re: snapshot-991207 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 10 Dec 1999 14:54:37 +1100."
             <00F8D6E8AB0DD3118F1A006008186C9607C7CE AT server1 DOT axonet DOT com DOT au> 
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 03:10:31 -0600
From: Mumit Khan <khan AT nanotech DOT wisc DOT edu>

Andrew Dalgleish <andrewd AT axonet DOT com DOT au> writes:
> 
> The cygcheck output below is from running winsup-19991207 
> (built on NT4sp5 + cygwin B20.1 + Mumit's gcc 2.95 + winsup-19991204)
> 

There's one potential problem here: there are a few bugs in the
w32api headers in winsup snapshots -- some of these are hidden
by bugs in v1.0 compiler and some of these were added to work
around the bug (mostly because it just worked!). There are only
a handful, all of these have to with incorrect packing in v1.0
compiler. I'm going to build winsup tomorrow with gcc-2.95.2 and 
see what gives.

Regards,
Mumit