Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 21:20:27 -0500 To: Andrew Dalgleish Cc: "'cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com'" Subject: Re: snapshot-991207 Message-ID: <19991209212027.A3308@cygnus.com> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Dalgleish , "'cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com'" References: <00F8D6E8AB0DD3118F1A006008186C9607C7CD AT server1 DOT axonet DOT com DOT au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <00F8D6E8AB0DD3118F1A006008186C9607C7CD@server1.axonet.com.au>; from andrewd@axonet.com.au on Fri, Dec 10, 1999 at 12:58:02PM +1100 On Fri, Dec 10, 1999 at 12:58:02PM +1100, Andrew Dalgleish wrote: > >> Nope. I've duplicated it. I'll see what the problem is. It doesn't >> seem to be thread-safe related and it probably isn't even a problem >> with >> the new signal code. It looks like my new mutex-like object is not as >> robust as I thought. >> >[Andrew Dalgleish] > >This might be related - "echo $(pwd)" outputs just a newline. >I first observed this in winsup-19991205, but I have not even begun to >look. >This was built on NT4sp5 + cygwin B20.1 + Mumit's gcc 2.95 + >winsup-19991204. I need more details than this. What shell are you using? Does pwd actually have a value? cgf