Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 20:50:59 -0500 To: John Fortin Cc: "cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com" Subject: Re: Maintainers wanted Message-ID: <19991118205059.B16415@cygnus.com> Mail-Followup-To: John Fortin , "cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com" References: <19991118160433 DOT A13395 AT cygnus DOT com> <3834A92C DOT D8B6FAD AT ibm DOT net> <19991118202709 DOT A16385 AT cygnus DOT com> <3834AD62 DOT C080EEF0 AT ibm DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <3834AD62.C080EEF0@ibm.net>; from fortinj@ibm.net on Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 08:52:34PM -0500 On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 08:52:34PM -0500, John Fortin wrote: >OK, but will there be a standard install format... Will packages install >in >/usr/local by default? The packages will install in /bin by default, just like the CD. I'm talking about the packages that are part of a normal cygwin net distribution. I don't know what you mean by "install format". I mentioned tar files. That is what I would imagine we'll be using. >When do we update a package, how many older releases will be available. Dunno. Probably a couple. >Am I responsible for ensuring the packages work under cygwin? Yes. That would be the primary responsiblity of a maintainer. cgf