Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 13:11:31 -0400 From: Chris Faylor To: Mumit Khan Cc: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: libcygwin.a as a symbolic link to lib{c,m}.a -- need insight Message-ID: <19990822131131.B823@cygnus.com> Mail-Followup-To: Mumit Khan , cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <19990820190641 DOT B7299 AT cygnus DOT com> <199908220655 DOT BAA06279 AT mercury DOT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i In-Reply-To: <199908220655.BAA06279@mercury.xraylith.wisc.edu>; from Mumit Khan on Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 01:55:50AM -0500 On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 01:55:50AM -0500, Mumit Khan wrote: >I vote for linking both libc.a and libm.a to libcygwin.a. In the future, >we should probably use -lc in gcc config files as well, but that's not >something we need to think about right now. Thanks, as always for the feedback, Mumit. Unless there are strong objections, I think I'll do this for B21. -chris