Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 17:25:20 -0400 To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: Terminal handling with the 990809 snapshot Message-ID: <19990817172520.A1621@cygnus.com> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <19990810210956 DOT A15706 AT ba DOT best DOT com> <19990811154056 DOT C1219 AT cygnus DOT com> <19990817145646 DOT C10229 AT ba DOT best DOT com> <19990817161636 DOT C976 AT cygnus DOT com> <19990817163824 DOT A21218 AT ba DOT best DOT com> <19990817164637 DOT A1353 AT cygnus DOT com> <19990817172017 DOT A3742 AT ba DOT best DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i In-Reply-To: <19990817172017.A3742@ba.best.com>; from Glenn Spell on Tue, Aug 17, 1999 at 05:20:17PM -0400 On Tue, Aug 17, 1999 at 05:20:17PM -0400, Glenn Spell wrote: >On 17 Aug 1999 around 4:46PM (-0400) Chris Faylor wrote: >> In other words, you've put back the code that I reverted (which >> caused problems for everyone) and things work correctly for you. > >That is a true statement, yes. > >> Isn't this exactly what I implied in my previous message? > >I only included that for the benefit of anyone who may be >inclined to work on this issue. I did not mean to suggest >that your changes should be reverted, per se. Oops. Sorry. You're right. It was obviously important to test my assertion and not just assume that I was right. In that case, thanks for doing this and my apologies for misunderstanding. cgf