Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 17:26:18 -0400 To: Mumit Khan Cc: cygwin-developers , Mikey Subject: Re: new core files Message-ID: <19990510172618.B28339@cygnus.com> References: <19990510164536 DOT C28227 AT cygnus DOT com> <199905102121 DOT QAA02070 AT modi DOT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i In-Reply-To: <199905102121.QAA02070@modi.xraylith.wisc.edu>; from Mumit Khan on Mon, May 10, 1999 at 04:21:56PM -0500 On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 04:21:56PM -0500, Mumit Khan wrote: >Chris Faylor writes: >> On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 07:48:00PM +0000, Mikey wrote: >> >The reason that win32 doesn't support core dumps >> >is that it supports JIT debugging. >> >> Didn't Egor's previous patch pretty much accomplish this? >> >> Core files definitely have a use that is not encompassed by JIT debugging. > >I believe JIT technology is capable of supporting these "post-mortem dumps", >but it's a lot of work to get it right. It would be nice for cygwin to handle these post-mortem dumps but I'll take whatever I can get... >I like core files. No wait, I hate core files ;-) I like core files when I'm debugging a problem. I hate core files cluttering up my disk... cgf