Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 23:05:02 -0500 To: jgm AT jgm DOT org Cc: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: Windows CE support Message-ID: <19990327230502.A15277@cygnus.com> References: <199903280345 DOT VAA22177 AT brain DOT capital-mkts DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i In-Reply-To: <199903280345.VAA22177@brain.capital-mkts.com>; from jgm@jgm.org on Sun, Mar 28, 1999 at 04:00:00AM -0000 It wouldn't be easy. There are *a lot* of API limitations in Windows CE. Cygwin uses a lot of the functions that aren't available on Windows CE. Incidentally, FYI, your email was strangely formatted. There were no line breaks. -chris On Sun, Mar 28, 1999 at 04:00:00AM -0000, jgm AT jgm DOT org wrote: >I'd like to tackle the problem of making "our" nifty Unix paradigm >available to those who want to write code on "HPC Pro" Windows CE >devices. These mini-notebooks are full-fledged computers in my mind >and could be very handy as development platforms for those of us who >need to write programs and compile tools for our portable needs *while* >staying mobile. For example, I'd like to have VIM for mine... which >presupposes a curses package for the CMD tool as well as something to >compile the code. I'd also like to use Apache to host a mini web site >over CDPD (hpc.jgm.org, BTW the Sierra Wireless AirCard 300 is very >cool)... Yes the GoAhead server or something else could be used, but >why reinvent the wheel?? > >I've not taken a close look at the SDK, but I've gathered that the API >is Unicode only-- what ramifications does this have? Is this whole >idea a nutty thing to undertake? Why/not? > >What about targeting multiple processors? (Has Cygwin addressed the >Alpha/NT combo? BTW I was able to run one of my multithreaded >financial statistics programs on a 21264 box under Digital UNIX >recently-- it was about 85% as fast as a 6CPU Sun E4500! Not bad for a >4CPU handicap, and at about 1/6th the cost!) > >Thanks, John -- cgf AT cygnus DOT com http://www.cygnus.com/