Delivered-To: listarch-cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Christopher Faylor Message-ID: <19990201142232.A27502@cygnus.com> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 14:22:32 -0500 To: DJ Delorie Cc: cygwin32-developers AT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: tiny patch for execvp [Re: Problems with winsup-981223] References: <19981227212632 DOT A24196 AT cygnus DOT com> <199901300438 DOT UAA19176 AT cygnus DOT com> <19990130010435 DOT O10431 AT cygnus DOT com> <199901302309 DOT SAA00319 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <19990131001707 DOT A19124 AT cygnus DOT com> <36b4f822 DOT 165663739 AT mail DOT goodnet DOT com> <19990201103846 DOT A26507 AT cygnus DOT com> <199902011909 DOT OAA29894 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93i In-Reply-To: <199902011909.OAA29894@envy.delorie.com>; from DJ Delorie on Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 02:09:58PM -0500 Sender: owner-cygwin32-developers AT cygnus DOT com On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 02:09:58PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: >> If so, does that mean that this code would do something funky: >> >> char *sys_errlist[]; >> main() >> { >> puts(sys_errlist[1]); >> } > >Yes. sys_errlist would be the address of a chunk of i386 opcodes, not >the address of the table of pointers to strings. So, I think that I would vastly prefer the link time error to a runtime core dump. I've modified libiberty and will be testing this today. -chris