Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Subject: RE: rebasing new packages?!
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 23:55:31 +1000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
Message-ID: <FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C5FA9@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: "Jason Tishler" <jason AT tishler DOT net>
Cc: <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g43DtZw14790



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason AT tishler DOT net] 
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:52 PM

> > As long as the required dependencies are easily satisfied:
> > a) STL headers + any libs for gcc on cygwin (i.e. OOTB build for 
> > developers).
> 
> Isn't a) already satisfied?

Possibly. I'm simply setting expectations.
 
> > b) STL headers + any libs for gcc -mno-cygwin (i.e. how I 
> build, and 
> > the documented release build on
> 
> Is b) satisfied by the following?
> 
    http://www.colomsat.net.co/freehost/ngiraldo/cppcygwin.html

b) is an alternative approach to what I've already documented here. So
it covers libstc++ aka libg++-3. I don't know how much of the STL that
includes (see my earlier email).

> > http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin-apps/setup.html).
> > c) STL headers + any libs for a linux hosted cross-chain targeting 
> > mingw. I.e. how I expected Chris builds.
> 
> I don't know how to satisfy c).
> 

If a & b are satisfied with the libg++-3 library and headers, then c) is
trivial.If not then someone needs to check it is doable.

Rob