Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RE: rebasing new packages?!
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 10:31:48 +1000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
Message-ID: <FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C5F9A@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: "Charles Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Cc: "Stipe Tolj" <tolj AT wapme-systems DOT de>,
   "cygwin-apps" <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g430Vrc28590



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles Wilson [mailto:cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu] 
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:28 AM

> I thought that the last time this subject came up, the consensus was 
> that Jason's code should go into the cinstall area (now, of 
> course, that 
> means the setup repository).  The standalone rebase.exe 
> should be built 
> within that project, along with setup.exe which would 
> leverage the same 
> code.
> 
> That way, there's no possibility that the two programs would get 
> out-of-sync with respect to the /etc/rebase.conf (?) information and 
> file format.

Yes, and at that point we had two issues:
1) We couldn't use libstdc++, let alone the STL. The STL still isn't
available - beyond whats in libg++-3.
2) I think that Jason's design needed some tweaking.

Rob