Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 11:47:59 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: MD5 support Message-ID: <20020501154759.GA16526@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 01:33:52AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: >> Hmm. Dueling "you do the work" scenarios. >> >> Why not just release an interim version of setup that >> silently ignores the third field? That's what we've done in the past. > >I planned to, but then, without realising it, I'd done the code :}. It >seemed like to much effort to strip it out, just to ensure more >testing... > Hmm. Dueling "you do the work" scenarios. cgf