Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 04:43:46 +1000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Robert Collins" To: "Ralf Habacker" , "Charles Wilson" Cc: "Kde-Cygwin" , "Binutils" , "Cygwin-Apps" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g3RIhqx00382 > -----Original Message----- > From: Ralf Habacker [mailto:Ralf DOT Habacker AT freenet DOT de] > Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 4:28 AM > > > > Hangon, lets go back a bit. Why do you want ordinal-only > linking? For > > runtime or link-time performance? Or for on-disk import > library size? > > Or.... > runtime performance Ok, well then check this : http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/0500/hood/hood0500.asp article out. Linking by ordinal only gives a 2%-4% improvement. rebinding and rebasing gives up to 18%. So linking by ordinal only will help you a little. rebinding and rebasing your .dll's will help much much more. And infact, rebasing and rebinding makes the INT obsolete - because the IAT is precalculated, so you can't get 22% by linking by ordinal and rebinding and rebasing. Rob