Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com To: Charles Wilson Cc: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: ITP: netpbm References: <87r8l2pf8w DOT fsf AT peder DOT flower> <3CC998A6 DOT 3030104 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Organization: Jan at Appel From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:42:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: <3CC998A6.3030104@ece.gatech.edu> (Charles Wilson's message of "Fri, 26 Apr 2002 14:12:54 -0400") Message-ID: <87it6dpm70.fsf@peder.flower> Lines: 39 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Charles Wilson writes: > Wonderful, please do. Ok. I've been away from email, as you noticed, and will be back tonight (CET). I'll have to consider if any big problems arise, because this mustn't turn into a time sink. > BTW, I have had a private version of netpbm, packaged in a > 'setup-compatible' way, for some time now. When I get home, I'll put > my version somewhere that you can access; you may want to expropriate > some of my patches... Ok, I'd like to have a look. What do these patches do, ie, (why) can't they flow upstream? > Also, which png have you linked against? 1.0.12, or 1.0.13? 1.0.13. I'll change dependencies to libpng10, and will split the package into netpbm, libnetpbm9, libnetpbm9-dev[el], simply mimicking what Debian is doing; that should be enough? I'll have to read up to the # binaries thing, the only thing I would like to consider* is moving /usr/bin to /usr/bin/netpbm, but I'd rather not. Greetings, Jan. * but only if there's a good reason because of broken filesystem and lookup support, and some sort of consensus (summary, anyone? :-) -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org