Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 22:55:55 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: info: single install xfree86 + minimal cygwin? Message-ID: <20020421025555.GD9745@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com References: <20020420225701 DOT GA10168 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 08:01:12PM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote: >>Btw, the new version of 'upset' does the right thing with things like >>this. If you have a directory called 'XFree86-fonts-100dpi' it will no >>longer assume that 100dpi is part of the version string. It just uses >>the directory name as a prefix for the .tar.bz2 files. > >That's good for completeness. But I am a stickler for tradition, so I >stuck with the old -f100 package name in that case. :) That's fine. I was just mentioning this for the archives. I think that the new 'upset' behavior allows a lot more flexibility in naming. cgf