Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 13:15:04 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packages available for comments and testing
Message-ID: <20020419171504.GA23436@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20020419020233 DOT GK7323 AT redhat DOT com> <NHEELHJHHFKPMAEAFMFCMEBFCNAA DOT huntharo AT msu DOT edu> <20020419165227 DOT GH20463 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020419165227.GH20463@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 12:52:27PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 01:24:48AM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote:
>>Chris,
>>
>>> Shall we add this to the cygwin distro or are we still waiting for
>>> some postinstall shell script work?
>>
>>These will forever be known as Harold's Famous Last Words:
>>	Sure Chris, why not?  Go ahead and add the packages to the distro.
>>
>>Be aware, I just updated XFree86-xserv to 4.2.0-2, so you'll need to grab
>>the latest packages off of ftp://huntharo-4.user.msu.edu/pub/cygwin/
>>
>>That's all for now.
>>
>>I can't wait to see how many people use Cygwin/XFree86 now!
>
>Ditto.  Hope you're ready for this.

It's up there.  Should be on mirrors shortly.

One thing I just noticed, though (by looking at
http://cygwin.com/packages/), was that the source tar.bz2 files don't
seem to be part of this.  There should probably be fewer source tar
balls than binary but they should be part of the distribution, right?
If not, we'll inevitably get questions.

cgf