Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Cc: cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: xfree packages References: <3CB3C24E DOT 9060803 AT znark DOT com> <20020410053447 DOT GA15157 AT redhat DOT com> Organization: Jan at Appel Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 09:34:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20020410053447.GA15157@redhat.com> (Christopher Faylor's message of "Wed, 10 Apr 2002 01:34:47 -0400") Message-ID: Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (powerpc-debian-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Christopher Faylor writes: > I think that these files should be called XFree86-base (or just > XFree86), etc. The project is the Cygwin/XFree86 project and I > think the package names should reflect that. Oh no, please reconsider allowing capitals in package names? You'll set a precedent for teTeX, GUILE, MySQL etc. I'd vote for xfree86. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org