Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 22:43:46 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Now that the new setup is here... Message-ID: <20020410024346.GY23551@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <3CB39CFA DOT 80101 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020410021303 DOT GQ23551 AT redhat DOT com> <3CB3A252 DOT 4080206 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020410023605 DOT GV23551 AT redhat DOT com> <3CB3A67C DOT 3050808 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3CB3A67C.3050808@ece.gatech.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:42:04PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >Oooohhhh, NOW I get it. I didn't understand that "verpat:" was a new >field in setup.hint, PARSED by upset. It's perfectly clear in hindsight. That's probably because, on rereading, my description didn't make that clear. >Nevermind my earlier comments. Time for some sleep. Ditto. cgf