Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: info: single install xfree86 + minimal cygwin? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 12:23:16 +1000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Robert Collins" To: "Charles Wilson" , "Ian Burrell" Cc: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g3A2NQn29224 > -----Original Message----- > From: Charles Wilson [mailto:cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu] > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:19 PM > I don't think it's that big a deal to require cygwin packages > to follow > a parseable naming scheme; ours is pretty lenient...when it > fails, it's > not a terrible imposition to either change a '-' to a '_', or > swap some > digits and alphabetics within a -XXXX- word. And package file names are not directly used by humans 99% of the time. That's what setup + cygcheck + upset are for. Rob