Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 22:08:05 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Now that the new setup is here... Message-ID: <20020410020805.GP23551@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <20020410001021 DOT GA23551 AT redhat DOT com> <3CB395E5 DOT 7070002 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020410014333 DOT GK23551 AT redhat DOT com> <3CB39B0D DOT 2050401 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3CB39B0D.2050401@ece.gatech.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:53:17PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >>Once that box is deployed we should have some excess capacity for things >>like rsync and maybe we can even allow downloads from >>sources.redhat.com again. > >But I thought the problem with sourceware has been (a) processing load >AND (b) bandwidth. The new machine may fix (a), but what of (b) ? Ah >well -- NMP(tm). [Not My Problem] Bandwidth hasn't been a problem for a while. It's on a T3 now. And, it may actually get better since we're talking about moving it to North Carolina and putting it in with some of the other servers which are connected to the internet with really serious bandwidth. cgf