Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: info: single install xfree86 + minimal cygwin?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 12:07:18 +1000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
Message-ID: <FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA76008AC97@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: "Charles Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Cc: "Ian Burrell" <iburrell AT znark DOT com>, <cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com>,
   <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g3A280U27584



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles Wilson [mailto:cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu] 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:23 AM

> Now, this works, and upset/setup are happy (every binary 
> package has a 
> "src" package) but it is hackish, ugly, and a pain to maintain.  Is 
> there a better solution?  (Or can we discard the psuedo-src packages 
> without repurcussion?  Won't upset be upset by the "bin without src" 
> problem?)

Setup won't be. It won't allow the src box to be ticked unless it knows
of a src package details.

Rob