Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 21:47:03 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: info: single install xfree86 + minimal cygwin? Message-ID: <20020410014703.GM23551@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com References: <3CB393D6 DOT 4030405 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020410012626 DOT GI23551 AT redhat DOT com> <3CB398DA DOT 2010202 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3CB398DA.2010202@ece.gatech.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:43:54PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >>If it is upset I'll be upset. >> >>It should be acceptable to have bin without source. >> >>If it causes a problem, I'll fix it. > >That's great. (I'm not planning on needlessly changing my packages, but >perhaps the next time they must be updated for other reasons, I'll drop >the psuedo-src packages). > >However, is there any way we can add to the setup/upset grammar an >optional keyword like: > >(within libncurses6's setup.hint) > external-src: ncurses > >This would require conflict avoidance within setup.exe, too -- the src >chkboxes for ncurses and libncurses6 should be tied together in this case... > >Or is this just not worth worrying about? I like the idea as far as upset is concerned. It would be easy to add. However, maybe the setup.exe part would be hairy. cgf