Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 20:10:21 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Now that the new setup is here... Message-ID: <20020410001021.GA23551@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:05:19AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: >> But those are social problems, not technical ones. > >And ones I have little sympathy for. Setup is a technical tool, not a >social one. It's not aimed at being the best downloader, only the best >installer. Mirroring that handles directory relocation is a sitecopy >style task... I'm not sure what reorg you were talking about but I've abandoned one of my plans to move everything into directories named after category names. That seemed like a lot of work for nothing. The only thing I can think of to do is to get rid of latest/contrib and move to something else, like 'release', with all of the current directories located underneath. AFAIK, this won't cause any undue download activity will it? Regardless, I'm with Robert. setup was never designed to be a mirroring tool or a site deployment tool. If people are relying on a particular directory arrangement then, er, tough... cgf