Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3CB35E81.1070704@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 17:34:57 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Gerrit P. Haase @ cygwin-apps" Subject: Re: SGML/XML packages available for testing References: <20020409142353 DOT GA4071 AT redhat DOT com> <127209722184 DOT 20020409232900 AT familiehaase DOT de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > It is still dubious for me. > Setup was able to fetch it from the server during 'Download only' with > version number '1'. But when doing an install from local directory it > wasn't offered anymore in the chooser. > IIRC Setup is able to install packages even if there is no version in > the name string (e.g. foo.tar.gz). Yes, but the problem here is that '-p4- is interpreted as "another part of the name" since it BEGINS with an alphabetic character. E.g. in "tetex-beta-", the 'beta' is part of the name, not a version. So, setup is probably recording this as package: xml-base-p4 version: 1 release: Perhaps renaming it to xml-base-4p-1 would help? Then, the parser would figure it out thus: package: xml-base version: 4p release: 1 Or am I just talking bull patties? --Chuck