Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:48:32 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: SGML/XML packages available for testing
Message-ID: <20020409142353.GA4071@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <15538.63178.55000.272674@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 02:12:26PM +0000, Markus Hoenicka wrote:
>Gerrit P. Haase writes:
> > @ tei-xml
> > sdesc: "The Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) XML DTD"
> > ldesc: "The Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) XML DTD
> > 
> > A large, modular, and flexible document type definition which is
> > widely used in linguistic applications, although it is as well
> > suitable for general-purpose documents.
> > 
> > See http://www.tei-c.org/ for more information."
> > category: Text
> > requires: libxslt tei-xsl sgml-base xml-base
> > [test]
> > version: 1
> > install: contrib/tei-xml/tei-xml-p4-1.tar.bz2 29310
> > source: contrib/tei-xml/tei-xml-p4-1-src.tar.bz2 28189
> > 
>
>Could it be that setup cannot handle the version string "p4-1"? This
>should be legal as far as I understand the Cygwin package
>documentation, but then I might have misunderstood something. Should I
>change the version string or should the setup maintainers look at
>their parser again?

Can you point me to a place in the cygwin package documentation which
indicates that p4-1 is a valid version number?  It isn't as far as
my understanding is concerned and I'd lke to rectify that.  I don't
see any way to unambiguously parse something like that.

cgf