Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 22:57:19 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Checksums [Was Re:fastcall] Message-ID: <20020408025719.GA2622@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <20020408013422 DOT GA12297 AT redhat DOT com> <20020408024858 DOT 18724 DOT qmail AT web14506 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020408024858.18724.qmail@web14506.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 12:48:58PM +1000, Danny Smith wrote: > --- Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at >11:28:20AM +1000, Danny Smith wrote: >> > --- Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 >> at >> >08:29:29AM +1000, Danny Smith wrote: > >> >If so, I am happy checking in windres patches. The checksum >> >patch is a bit more intrusive into BFD-land and needs review. >> >> I asked DJ to reevaluate that one a week or so ago. Have you tried it? >> If it just modifies pe-specific code, I'd say we should ping the author >> to >> see if he has any further tweaks (this patch has a two or three month >> history) and, if not, check it in. > >I tried this version: >http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-01/msg00395.html > and yes it works, without causing any new failures. > >I haven't tried using it to build working device drivers though. > >I have written to Caspar requesting that he refresh his patch on binutils >list. Thanks. Maybe I should create a user on sourceware called Daniel G. Collins who can approve binutils patches. :-) cgf