Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 21:15:24 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: fastcall Message-ID: <20020408011524.GB11990@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:54:00AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: >>Chris asked the question a while ago: "Wanna be a binutils maintainer". > >Are you asking if someone here can step up? I'd love to, but I suspect >I don't have the time to do a good job. I'm struggling to answer all >setup.exe related questions at the moment. Also, I think the issue is >needing the binutils w32 maintainer, not a cygwin port maintainer, and >frankly, I've no idea what sort of time commitment that entails. If >someone (perhaps DJ) can clarify that I'll consider stepping up for >that maintainership - on the basis of someone being better than no-one, >even if I'm a bit slow on response for them. Maybe we can all be a binutils maintainer committee. How about selecting three people to oversee patches, Danny, Me, and Robert (Chuck and Corinna are also welcome). If, after voting, no one disagrees with a patch, it can go in. One of us can do the manual work of checking it in. How does that sound? Robert, out of curiousity, do you have an assignment with the FSF? cgf