Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: Should setup suggests to downgrade? [WAS: Lillypond for cygwin] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 17:35:38 +1000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Robert Collins" To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g367Zsr31027 > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com] > Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 4:20 PM > I'm not sure how. If you're talking about my suggestion, if > you switched to a test view and installed things, the next > time you ran setup you'd still default to current so, I > presume that setup would still suggest a downgrade. Sorry, I was taking as read that if we made the three things into three effectively different distributions that setup would remember the last choice of prev/curr/test. > setup should probably *never* suggest either going backwards > or uninstalling. I think it should suggest uninstalling when a requirement is uninstalled - but in a very visible fashion. As for going backwards, I haven't thought that completely through yet. Rob