Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3CACD5AE.35C1A7B3@lapo.it>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 00:37:34 +0200
From: Lapo Luchini <lapo AT lapo DOT it>
X-Accept-Language: it,en,fr,es,ja
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mailing List: CygWin-Apps <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: UPX & UCL
References: <3CACBF88 DOT B40FDF6C AT lapo DOT it> <9565317593 DOT 20020405002921 AT familiehaase DOT de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> > I just created the package for UCL.. but I found that UPX doesn't
> > directly use the UCL library that the UCL packages install, it needs the
> > full UCL source directory.
> The upx binary doesn't need UCL to be installed, just link against the
> static lib.  IIRC correctly UCL is only needed to build UPX.

Yes of course, I was talking about the UPX source package.
The problem is that building UPX needs the full UCL install and not only the
compiled library.
This is why I thought including a subdirectory with UCL in UPX source package
was more appropriate than having to install also UCL-src.

Any suggestion?

--
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
lapo AT lapo DOT it (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)