Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3CAB49C9.1070504@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 13:28:25 -0500 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Prentis Brooks CC: Corinna Vinschen Subject: Re: TCP Wrappers References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I've whipped up a repackaged version of your -src, that follows the approved conventions. Also, it uses a shell script to control building, and installs the man pages, header file, has a postinstall script to create /etc/hosts.allow/deny if they dont already exist, etc. I'll mail it to you privately, Prentis. The "hooks" are there to build/install the DLL version, but the allow_severity/deny_severity problem I referred to in my earlier message has to be fixed first, then you can uncomment the "hooks" in Makefile and in the shell script. --Chuck Prentis Brooks wrote: > I am willing to look into this, it currently does not use libtool, so I > have a lot of mods to make that happen, if I understood cgf right. > > I get cable modem today so I will be able to do more from home now ;) > > On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > >>On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 09:06:55AM -0500, Prentis Brooks wrote: >> >>>Hey Guys, what is the status of the TCP Wrapper upload? I got an email >>>from Rob stating that he had problems getting to the files, I fixed the >>>problem and responded, but no word since. >>> >>I've uploaded it to the contrib area. I took the freedom to rename >>the package from "tcp_wrappers_7.6..." to "tcp_wrappers-7.6...", just >>a dash instead of an underscore in front of the version number. >> >>Prepare to announce in a few hours. >> >>Btw., IMHO it would be really nice to get libwrap as a DLL in a near >>future. I'd like to link OpenSSH dynamically against tcp wrappers... >> >>Thanks, >>Corinna >> >> >> >