Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: move texmf-* out of test?
Organization: Jan at Appel
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 12:41:54 +0200
Message-ID: <m34rit5aj1.fsf@appel.lilypond.org>
Lines: 16
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2
 (powerpc-debian-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hi,

As tetex-beta-20001218-4 (now in curr) and texmf-*-20000804-2 seem to
work well together, can we remove the test marker from texmf?  I
thought there was a three weeks period for test; who's keeping track
of that?

We've had some complaints, esp. wrt setup.exe suggesting to downgrade
tetex (see cygwin list of this week).

Greetings,
Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien       | http://www.lilypond.org