Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 00:15:20 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: setup.exe gui testing Message-ID: <20020328051520.GB6737@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 07:29:56AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >Ok, folks, proof is in the experimentation. > >http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-guitest-20020328.exe > >See what y'all think. I'm sorry but I still don't like the cycling version thing. No scenario that uses that is going to thrill me. I don't know what problem the advanced version selection is supposed to solve, either. (sorry to let the cat out of the bag on the check box) cgf