Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3CA1FF66.9060305@cox.net> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 12:20:38 -0500 From: "David A. Cobb" Organization: CoxNet User User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.9+) Gecko/20020322 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Charles Wilson CC: Robert Collins , cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Keeping base, adding standard. References: <3C9FAE2B DOT 1070706 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Charles Wilson wrote: > Robert Collins wrote: > >>> Again, you're inventing another layer that I maintain will only >>> confuse things. >>> >> I see your point. > [SNIP] > > Red Hat Linux's installation (used to, perhaps still does) separate > the concept of "Installation Type" and "Individual Package Selection". > You'd pick "Workstation Install" and that would preselect a bunch of > pacakges, or you'd pick "Server Install" and that would preselect a > different set of packages. Of course, there was ALSO the option of > continuing to the detailed package selection step, where you could > override those choice: don't install some packages that were > auto-selected by the Installation Type choice, or DO install other > packages that were not auto-selected. So, how about the first(?) page being "Workstation Install", "Server Install", . . . "Custom Install"? Hey, looks like many commercial installers that do just that. {Well, they do "Minimal" "Complete" "Custom", or the like). -- David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate "By God's Grace I am a Christian man, by my actions a great sinner." -- The Way of a Pilgrim; R. M. French, tr. Life is too short to tolerate crappy software. .