Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3CA1FB86.80504@cox.net> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 12:04:06 -0500 From: "David A. Cobb" Organization: CoxNet User User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.9+) Gecko/20020322 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: prev/curr/test References: <20020323061924 DOT GA3593 AT redhat DOT com> <20020326011004 DOT GE27207 AT redhat DOT com> <20020326020902 DOT GA29706 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 08:27:04PM -0500, Brian Keener wrote: > >You don't. You find some other method for reverting to software that >is <1 revision old. This is not a hardship. AFAIK, setup has never >allowed you to do more than prev/curr/test. > A thought: mandate that every package tarball contain a standard-named install script - similar in concept to the Micro$quash setup.inf. Then simply keeping the old tarball would supply the user the mechanism to drop back to that version. > >>I like the simpler approach for sure but let my option I select tell me >>everything - don't give me 4 different buttons and umpteen combinations >>to choose from to get where I want to be - talk about confusing. >> > >And how do you know when you've hit the current version? You see it >scroll by and remember that you want "1.4.9-1 bin" and then click the >mouse ten more times to get back to that. That's really not user >friendly, IMO. > >cgf > -- David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate "By God's Grace I am a Christian man, by my actions a great sinner." -- The Way of a Pilgrim; R. M. French, tr. Life is too short to tolerate crappy software. .