Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 20:27:04 EST To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: prev/curr/test Message-Id: From: Brian Keener Reply-To: bkeener AT thesoftwaresource DOT com In-Reply-To: <20020326011004.GE27207@redhat.com> References: <20020323061924 DOT GA3593 AT redhat DOT com> <20020326011004 DOT GE27207 AT redhat DOT com> Christopher Faylor wrote: > Sorry, but I really don't like this. Adding a whole bunch of new things > for a user to cycle through (or even select from a pulldown) is moving > in the wrong direction, IMO. But a big deal at one point in time was the ability to get to packages/versions that were in the local directory and install those - how else can you do this if you limit your self to prev, curr, and test. What if the current setup.ini has a prev version and a current version but I still have the one prior to the prev version and it was right the two most recent are wrong and I want to roll back to it - How do I do this under you folks way of thinking. I like the simpler approach for sure but let my option I select tell me everything - don't give me 4 different buttons and umpteen combinations to choose from to get where I want to be - talk about confusing. Just my thoughts and .02 worth.