Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3C96D9B7.8000904@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 01:24:55 -0500 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Collins CC: CygWin-Apps Subject: Re: release setup now? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Robert Collins wrote: > Can we? Huh huh? I think so. I know of two minor (non-show-stopper) nits: 1) IF (and only if) folks have used the setup-snapshots AND they happened to use a particular version (dunno which one, sorry), then the foo.lst.gz files in /etc/setup that were created by this particular bad setup.exe, contain 0x00 bytes at the end of each line. This has been fixed in setup itself -- but the bad .lst.gz files remain. This *may* cause trouble in the future (when the .lst file is re-read for uninstall) but a) it only affects a few people b) it may not even be a problem (don't borrow trouble) c) it's easily fixed by hand 2) It seems that when uninstalling (or upgrading), if the uninstalled package leaves behing a directory that is empty, the directory is not removed. Not a big deal, and certainly not a showstopper. --Chuck