Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3C94BF71.140E9B7B@yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 11:08:17 -0500 From: Earnie Boyd Reply-To: Earnie Boyd X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Link for MORE References: <20020317155943 DOT GA25951 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 02:56:30AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com] > >> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:39 AM > > > >>Actually, I don't think there is any reason to have a default > >>/etc/profile for ash. I think it is really only useful for bash. The > >>current /etc/profile seems to assume that it is running under bash. > >>However, it really should be more ash friendly since ash reads > >>/etc/profile. Either that or maybe ash should read something other > >>than /etc/profile. > > > >Well, my interest begins and ends with the file creation being moved > >somewhere sensible. Simply running setup should not create > >/etc/profile any more than installing sed. > > Yep. Agreed. > I'm not sure I agree. It doesn't matter what creates it, it needs created. Go back before DJ created the patch to setup and take a look at the mail list. It's a needed item, setup does it now. It's a living method. It needs a modification, so just modify it. I would; but, Robert, you've it already in your sandbox and it's such a simple change. Earnie. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com