Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 10:59:43 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Link for MORE Message-ID: <20020317155943.GA25951@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 02:56:30AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com] >> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:39 AM > >>Actually, I don't think there is any reason to have a default >>/etc/profile for ash. I think it is really only useful for bash. The >>current /etc/profile seems to assume that it is running under bash. >>However, it really should be more ash friendly since ash reads >>/etc/profile. Either that or maybe ash should read something other >>than /etc/profile. > >Well, my interest begins and ends with the file creation being moved >somewhere sensible. Simply running setup should not create >/etc/profile any more than installing sed. Yep. Agreed. Apparently the interest of everyone else here ends a lot earlier than that. cgf