Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Subject: RE: reducing binary distribution size with UPX X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 23:22:30 +1100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: reducing binary distribution size with UPX Thread-Index: AcHMGdWVPkvG7bQ7RNqmZyPpPUV+5QAAifgg From: "Robert Collins" To: "Lapo Luchini" , "CygWin-Apps" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g2FCMbO23119 > -----Original Message----- > From: Lapo Luchini [mailto:lapo AT lapo DOT it] > Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 10:55 PM > To: CygWin-Apps > Subject: Re: reducing binary distribution size with UPX > > > > No sideeffects;) > > I'm using it since a year now. > > Fetch my binary: http://familiehaase.de/cywgin/compression/upx/ > > rsync.exe 2.5.4-1 shrinks from 167936 down to 72704, and .bz2 > archive too shrinks from 95901 down to 94571 (I didn't expect > this one)... anyone has objections if I pack future rsync > version with UPX, or it's "green"? Uhmm, UPX should be part of the distribution first, as a maintained pacakge, before folk start packing distributed binaries with it. Do we have a volunteer to maintain UPX? Rob