Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:53:21 +0100 From: Pavel Tsekov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53d) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091 Reply-To: Pavel Tsekov Organization: Syntrex, Inc. X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1335664445.20020313105321@syntrex.com> To: Charles Wilson CC: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re[2]: [PATCH suggestion] aclocal wrapper script loops forever if automake-devel or automake-stable is missing In-Reply-To: <3C8F1258.50600@ece.gatech.edu> References: <416981789 DOT 20020312131817 AT syntrex DOT com> <3C8F1258 DOT 50600 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Charles, Wednesday, March 13, 2002, 9:48:24 AM, you wrote: CW> Pavel Tsekov wrote: >> Hey, there! :) >> >> Does the attached patch make any sense ? It prevents an infinite loop >> if either automake-devel or automake-stable is missing. >> CW> Yes, it does -- of course, setup enforces that automake depends on CW> automake-devel and automake-stable, so if you see this error it's CW> because you've overridden setup.exe... Yes - I did deselect automake-devel manually but from setup.exe - I never install packages manually. CW> Or you set the AUTO_STABLE / AUTO_DEVEL environment variables (incorrectly). Nope - the case was that the aclocal wrapper searches for AC_PREREQ to decide which version to use, but the configure.in did not contain one, so the wrapper picked the development version which was not installed. I was configuring the CommonC++ 2 library v 0.99.1 and its configure script has a check for aclocal which was hanging - this way I found the problem. CW> I've incorporated your suggestions into the next version of the CW> wrappers. However, as a general note, there are a few problems with CW> your submission: [...] Yes - I don't know too much of all the auto* stuff so I was not sure if I'm not missing something very stupid and thus experiencing this behaviour :) CW> I have done all of the above, so no worries this time. However, next CW> time... I know, i know.. :) Thanks, Chuck! :)