Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <03aa01c1bd7a$093bac50$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: References: <052f01c1a735$e7e4ee90$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20020128170537 DOT GC3669 AT redhat DOT com> <035c01c1a851$da7ee090$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <027d01c1a856$33e16d70$0d00a8c0 AT mchasecompaq> <02dc01c1bd29$2725ebf0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20020224170716 DOT GA18286 AT redhat DOT com> Subject: Re: base-files package needs a maintainer Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 08:27:17 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Feb 2002 21:26:20.0294 (UTC) FILETIME=[E6BD4260:01C1BD79] === ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" > Wow, I had to go back through the archives to see what you were talking > about. This is an old thread. > > I guess I can fix this myself. > > I can add this to the "repository" but how should it be handled? Should > there be a new "base-files" package that bash relies on? Or should everyone > rely on it? Having awk rely on a package which only creates /etc/profile > seems wrong. In that case, it shouldn't be called base-files, should it? > Maybe it should be called something like "shell-init" or something. Being in base, it will automatically get installed. > I guess I'll respond to that message. I'll follow up on the rest after that then. Rob