Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 11:51:58 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: pkgconfig
Message-ID: <20020223165158.GB4475@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References: <FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA760014ADE AT itdomain003 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au> <3C774EAA DOT 9000204 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3C774EAA.9000204@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 03:11:22AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>In fact, I'd go so far to suggest that we abolish latest and contrib 
>>altogether.. 
>
>Well, yeah, me too -- but setup got confused, according to some users, 
>the last time we tried moving packages around (ncurses).  Lets verify 
>that the soon-to-be-released setup can handle moving ONE package 
>(gettext?) before advocating a wholesale rearrangement.  (AND give 
>everybody out there some time to switch from the old 'stable' setup to 
>the new 2.194.2.x one).
>
>Wasn't Chris mumbling about rearranging stuff at some point?

Um, yeah.  I was mm, grb, by category, hmm, symbolic links..

cgf