Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:19:09 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: setup w/char* eliminated is big Message-ID: <20020214151909.GE23253@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <011401c1b53b$01de5350$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <011401c1b53b$01de5350$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 08:35:57PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >Ok, > finally got some breathing time. > >Setup with char * eliminated is ~350K. Ouch. > >This is why I've not committed my patch yet (I've been trying to see >*where* the extra 100K appeared from). > >Chris - is this a problem? IMO it's still a tiny fraction of the total >distribution size, and we're reducing the number of reasons a setup >update is *required* as we make /etc/profile and so on into packages. I dunno. I think it probably is a problem. I assume that you're using more of libstdc++.a which will be a problem for cross compiles. cgf