Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:54:35 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Cc: Jonathan Kamens Subject: Re: Updated: postgresql-7.2-2 Message-ID: <20020212185435.GG26027@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com, Jonathan Kamens References: <20020212131000 DOT GA1248 AT dothill DOT com> <20020212174640 DOT 6948 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20020212181000 DOT GG1248 AT dothill DOT com> <20020212191656 DOT G14241 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20020212184816 DOT GH1248 AT dothill DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020212184816.GH1248@dothill.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 01:48:17PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: >Corinna, > >On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 07:16:56PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 01:10:01PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: >> > Maybe I should just mark postgresql-7.2-2 as "test" and be done with it? >> >> Sounds like a good idea. > >I just marked postgresql-7.2-2 as "test" -- hopefully, this is sufficient. > >> Unfortunately I didn't read the whole announcement before accepting >> it so it's also my fault. > >Thanks for trying to take some of the "blame," but it is really my fault >for jumping the gun. I was just trying to circumvent those "Package foo >was released yesterday, why isn't the Cygwin package ready yet?" posts. FWIW, I have no problem releasing 1.3.10. I just need confirmation from Corinna that it is stable. Has anyone run the cygwin test suite on a recent Cygwin from CVS? cgf