Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <0b1d01c1a98c$c06d51f0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: References: <20020130044040 DOT GA6286 AT redhat DOT com> Subject: Re: setup.exe looks good! Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 23:50:52 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jan 2002 12:50:42.0692 (UTC) FILETIME=[BA2A1440:01C1A98C] === ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" To: Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 3:40 PM Subject: setup.exe looks good! > I just built the latest setup.exe. It looks really nice. And, I see that > clickable categories are working! :]. It happens, bit by bit. > Can I suggest one more GUI feature that I think has been lacking from > Categories? (I know I said no new features but I think this is > important) I have a huge checkin that is going in sooon, and will be the last before I tag it in CVS. Bugfixes only from that point on. > I keep meaning to suggest that we add a '+' or a '>' to the left of all > of the Categories so that it is obvious that they can be expanded. I > think that people are used to interpreting the icon next to something as > indicating that there are more things possible to list. Done. > Hopefully, that won't translate into it being completely incomprehensible > for everyone on the cygwin AT cygwin list. Heh. Don't mention the war :}. Rob