Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:19:43 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-Apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANN] rcs-5.7 package available Message-ID: <20020122171943.GA26672@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-Apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <3C4D48F6 DOT 451D720C AT wapme-systems DOT de> <20020122123419 DOT N23034 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3C4D5EAB DOT D3F0A25D AT yahoo DOT com> <3C4D86EF DOT 9020405 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020122172233 DOT GC952 AT dothill DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020122172233.GC952@dothill.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 12:22:33PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: >On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 10:36:15AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >> Earnie Boyd wrote: >> > With CVS already working do we need RCS? >> >> Sure -- let a thousand flowers bloom. Besides, there are some client >> applications that expect to use RCS as the backend, not CVS. > >I vote "yes" for this package too. Ditto. cgf