Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 16:19:13 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygapp <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: apache-1.3.22-4 no-detach patch
Message-ID: <20020118161913.C11608@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To: cygapp <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <3C475FB1 DOT 26A73DB7 AT wapme-systems DOT de> <20020118093341 DOT A18161 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3C47EC5B DOT D0886E51 AT wapme-systems DOT de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3C47EC5B.D0886E51@wapme-systems.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i

On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 10:35:23AM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 12:35:13AM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> > > Corinna,
> > >
> > > could you please apply the attached patch against the last 1.3.22-3
> > > source tree. This will turn detaching of the parent process off.
> > > Please try if this makes cygrunsrv happy.
> > 
> > Didn't you test it?  Anyway, I don't have the source tree.  I'd
> > appreciate if you could give me a pointer to a binary archive.
> 
> I did test it if it stays attached and if the service itself is
> operational. I wanted to let you do the cygrunsrv magic, it's your
> thing I guess.

I'm testing running under cygrunsrv if you send me a pointer
to the binary.  I'm not going to build apache by myself.

> > Hmm, I'd vote for a command line option...  '-n' for `nodetach' or so?
> 
> -n is used for the Win32 native port as you pointed out. I'm not sure
> what the Apache officials think about this. They may claim that this
> may lead to confusion. Anyway, if we decide to have a flag, I would
> appritiate it if it is OS-wide, that means any UNIX platform may use
> it to run with no-detach. I have posted a RFC for this on the Apache
> developers list.

That's probably the better approach.  Unfortunately the `-D' is
already used.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.