Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 09:33:41 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: apache-1.3.22-4 no-detach patch
Message-ID: <20020118093341.A18161@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <3C475FB1 DOT 26A73DB7 AT wapme-systems DOT de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3C475FB1.26A73DB7@wapme-systems.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i

On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 12:35:13AM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> Corinna,
> 
> could you please apply the attached patch against the last 1.3.22-3
> source tree. This will turn detaching of the parent process off.
> Please try if this makes cygrunsrv happy.

Didn't you test it?  Anyway, I don't have the source tree.  I'd
appreciate if you could give me a pointer to a binary archive.

> I haven't included any extra starting flag. In this case apache does
> not detach by default for Cygwin. Any objections from the others?

Hmm, I'd vote for a command line option...  '-n' for `nodetach' or so?

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.